主 題: 資本流入到發(fā)展中國(guó)家： 一個(gè)由國(guó)際貿(mào)易出發(fā)的觀(guān)點(diǎn) (Capital Flows to Developing Countries: A View from Trade)
內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介: 本文在新貿(mào)易理論框架下研究了資本流動(dòng)對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的作用，并且對(duì)Gourinchas and Jeanne's (2013)的著名的分配之謎（在發(fā)展中國(guó)家，資本流入和生長(zhǎng)率增長(zhǎng)呈現(xiàn)負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系）提出了可能的解釋。本文將Dekle, Eaton and Kortum (2007) 模型和 Krugman and Venables (1995)模型相結(jié)合，構(gòu)建并校準(zhǔn)了一個(gè)貿(mào)易模型。本文的模型對(duì)分配之謎提供了一個(gè)直覺(jué)上可信的解釋?zhuān)⑶倚?zhǔn)的結(jié)果非常契合Gourinchas and Jeanne的數(shù)據(jù)。
I look at the role of capital flows in economic development through the lens of the `new' trade theory and propose a possible solution to Gourinchas and Jeanne's (2013) famous allocation puzzle (i.e., a negative correlation between capital inflows and productivity growth in the developing countries). To this purpose, I formulate, calibrate and compute a simple quantitative trade model that marries Dekle, Eaton and Kortum (2007) with Krugman and Venables (1995). The model provides an intuitively appealing explanation for the allocation puzzle and a calibrated version of it replicates surprisingly well the key patterns in Gourinchas and Jeanne's data.
報(bào)告人: Paolo Epifani 教授 曾任中國(guó)寧波諾丁漢大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)
時(shí) 間: 2019-05-06 15:00
地 點(diǎn): 位育樓117
舉辦單位: 城市發(fā)展研究院 科研部
內(nèi)容簡(jiǎn)介: 本文在新貿(mào)易理論框架下研究了資本流動(dòng)對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的作用，并且對(duì)Gourinchas and Jeanne's (2013)的著名的分配之謎（在發(fā)展中國(guó)家，資本流入和生長(zhǎng)率增長(zhǎng)呈現(xiàn)負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系）提出了可能的解釋。本文將Dekle, Eaton and Kortum (2007) 模型和 Krugman and Venables (1995)模型相結(jié)合，構(gòu)建并校準(zhǔn)了一個(gè)貿(mào)易模型。本文的模型對(duì)分配之謎提供了一個(gè)直覺(jué)上可信的解釋?zhuān)⑶倚?zhǔn)的結(jié)果非常契合Gourinchas and Jeanne的數(shù)據(jù)。
I look at the role of capital flows in economic development through the lens of the `new' trade theory and propose a possible solution to Gourinchas and Jeanne's (2013) famous allocation puzzle (i.e., a negative correlation between capital inflows and productivity growth in the developing countries). To this purpose, I formulate, calibrate and compute a simple quantitative trade model that marries Dekle, Eaton and Kortum (2007) with Krugman and Venables (1995). The model provides an intuitively appealing explanation for the allocation puzzle and a calibrated version of it replicates surprisingly well the key patterns in Gourinchas and Jeanne's data.
報(bào)告人: Paolo Epifani 教授 曾任中國(guó)寧波諾丁漢大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院院長(zhǎng)
時(shí) 間: 2019-05-06 15:00
地 點(diǎn): 位育樓117
舉辦單位: 城市發(fā)展研究院 科研部
上一篇：下一篇：
